Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589260›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Social prescribing for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and why - protocol for a complex intervention systematic review.

Jessica Marshall, Evie Papavasiliou, Chris Fox, Matthew Hawkes, Anne Irvine, Esme Moniz-Cook, Aimee Pick, Marie J Polley, Joanne Reeve, Louise Robinson and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jessica MarshallFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-8234-6077
Evie PapavasiliouUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-515X
Chris FoxUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-5704
Matthew HawkesUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Anne IrvineUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Esme Moniz-CookUniversity of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-4632
Aimee PickUniversity of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-6361-2297
Marie J PolleyMeaningful Measures Ltd, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3823-5668
Joanne ReeveHull York Medical School, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3144-7955
Louise RobinsonInstitute for Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0209-2503
George RookFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Euan SadlerFaculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3827-224X
Emma WolversonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-7862
Sarah WalkerUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-1093
Jane L CrossUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK j.cross@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7003-1916
SPLENDID Collaboration

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers experience complex needs often exacerbated by social isolation and challenges in accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) seeks to enable PLWD and their carers to access community and voluntary sector resources to support them address such needs. Existing research, however, does not describe what SP interventions are currently in place in dementia care. Little is known about the needs these interventions are designed to address, the reasons that lead PLWD and their carers to participate in them, their effectiveness and the extent to which they could increase positive health outcomes if adopted and how. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A complex intervention systematic review of SP for PLWD and/or their carers will be conducted using an iterative logic model approach. Six electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane/CENTRAL) and two grey literature databases (EThOS and CORE) were searched for publications between 1 January 2003 and June 2023, supplemented by handsearching of reference lists of included studies. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, using Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework, will be independently performed by two reviewers. A narrative approach will be employed to synthesise and report quantitative and qualitative data. Reporting will be informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Complex Interventions extension statement and checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required due to this systematic review operating only with secondary sources. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and meetings with key stakeholders including healthcare professionals, patient and carer groups, community organisations (eg, the Social Prescribing Network and the Evidence Collaborative at the National Academy for Social Prescribing), policymakers and funding bodies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023428625.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansResearch DesignSocial IsolationSocial SupportDementiaHealth EquityHealth Services for the AgedPatient NavigationPrimary CarePUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID38589260
PMCPMC11015224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.