Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589251›Full record

ArticleGenome research2024

Plant genome evolution in the genus

Scott Ferguson, Ashley Jones, Kevin Murray, Rose Andrew, Benjamin Schwessinger, Justin Borevitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Scott Ferguson *Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601, Australia; scott.ferguson.papers@gmail.com ashley.jones@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-7490
Ashley Jones *Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601, Australia; scott.ferguson.papers@gmail.com ashley.jones@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-1666
Kevin MurrayResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-1917
Rose AndrewBotany & N.C.W. Beadle Herbarium, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0099-8336
Benjamin SchwessingerResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-2922
Justin BorevitzResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-3699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes have a highly organized architecture (nonrandom organization of functional and nonfunctional genetic elements within chromosomes) that is essential for many biological functions, particularly gene expression and reproduction. Despite the need to conserve genome architecture, a high level of structural variation has been observed within species. As species separate and diverge, genome architecture also diverges, becoming increasingly poorly conserved as divergence time increases. However, within plant genomes, the processes of genome architecture divergence are not well described. Here we use long-read sequencing and de novo assembly of 33 phylogenetically diverse, wild and naturally evolving

Indexed as

EucalyptusEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantChromosomes, PlantGene RearrangementGenetic VariationPhylogenySynteny

Identifiers

PMID38589251
PMCPMC11146599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.