Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589232›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Impaired Cortical Tracking of Speech in Children with Developmental Language Disorder.

Anni Nora, Oona Rinkinen, Hanna Renvall, Elisabet Service, Eva Arkkila, Sini Smolander, Marja Laasonen, Riitta Salmelin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anni NoraDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland anni.nora@aalto.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-5101-5091
Oona RinkinenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland.
Hanna RenvallDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland.
Elisabet ServiceDepartment of Linguistics and Languages, Centre for Advanced Research in Experimental and Applied Linguistics (ARiEAL), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7698-1189
Eva ArkkilaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics, Head and Neck Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Sini SmolanderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics, Head and Neck Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Marja LaasonenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics, Head and Neck Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Riitta SalmelinDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo FI-00076, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In developmental language disorder (DLD), learning to comprehend and express oneself with spoken language is impaired, but the reason for this remains unknown. Using millisecond-scale magnetoencephalography recordings combined with machine learning models, we investigated whether the possible neural basis of this disruption lies in poor cortical tracking of speech. The stimuli were common spoken Finnish words (e.g., dog, car, hammer) and sounds with corresponding meanings (e.g., dog bark, car engine, hammering). In both children with DLD (10 boys and 7 girls) and typically developing (TD) control children (14 boys and 3 girls), aged 10-15 years, the cortical activation to spoken words was best modeled as time-locked to the unfolding speech input at ∼100 ms latency between sound and cortical activation. Amplitude envelope (amplitude changes) and spectrogram (detailed time-varying spectral content) of the spoken words, but not other sounds, were very successfully decoded based on time-locked brain responses in bilateral temporal areas; based on the cortical responses, the models could tell at ∼75-85% accuracy which of the two sounds had been presented to the participant. However, the cortical representation of the amplitude envelope information was poorer in children with DLD compared with TD children at longer latencies (at ∼200-300 ms lag). We interpret this effect as reflecting poorer retention of acoustic-phonetic information in short-term memory. This impaired tracking could potentially affect the processing and learning of words as well as continuous speech. The present results offer an explanation for the problems in language comprehension and acquisition in DLD.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersMagnetoencephalographySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentCerebral CortexChildFemaleHumansMaleSpeechdevelopmentdevelopmental language disordermachine learningmagnetoencephalographyspeech processing

Identifiers

PMID38589232
PMCPMC11140678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.