ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2024
Multimodal modeling with low-dose CT and clinical information for diagnostic artificial intelligence on mediastinal tumors: a preliminary study.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinically applicable and generalizable deep learning model for anterior mediastinal tumors in CT images across multiple institutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning outperforms clinical and brain region models in predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: an explainable AI study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk stratification of mediastinal masses using a predictive model based on CT radiomics and clinical data.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Predictive value of CT-based imaging model forTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosing mediastinal tumours, including incidental lesions, using low-dose CT (LDCT) performed for lung cancer screening, is challenging. It often requires additional invasive and costly tests for proper characterisation and surgical planning. This indicates the need for a more efficient and patient-centred approach, suggesting a gap in the existing diagnostic methods and the potential for artificial intelligence technologies to address this gap. This study aimed to create a multimodal hybrid transformer model using the Vision Transformer that leverages LDCT features and clinical data to improve surgical decision-making for patients with incidentally detected mediastinal tumours.
methodsThis retrospective study analysed patients with mediastinal tumours between 2010 and 2021. Patients eligible for surgery (n=30) were considered 'positive,' whereas those without tumour enlargement (n=32) were considered 'negative.' We developed a hybrid model combining a convolutional neural network with a transformer to integrate imaging and clinical data. The dataset was split in a 5:3:2 ratio for training, validation and testing. The model's efficacy was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis across 25 iterations of random assignments and compared against conventional radiomics models and models excluding clinical data.
resultsThe multimodal hybrid model demonstrated a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, significantly outperforming the non-clinical data model (AUC=0.86, p=0.04) and radiomics models (random forest AUC=0.81, p=0.008; logistic regression AUC=0.77, p=0.004).
conclusionIntegrating clinical and LDCT data using a hybrid transformer model can improve surgical decision-making for mediastinal tumours, showing superiority over models lacking clinical data integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.