ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Improving the performance of supervised deep learning for regulatory genomics using phylogenetic augmentation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balanced DNA interpolation improves learning of genetic distance-informed embeddings in plants.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Toward generalizable and interpretable AI in regulatory genomics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Innovative data augmentation strategy for deep learning on biological datasets with limited gene representations focused on chloroplast genomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Combining Machine Learning and Multiplexed,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Semi-supervised learning with pseudo-labeling compares favorably with large language models for regulatory sequence prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- EvoAug-TF: extending evolution-inspired data augmentations for genomic deep learning to TensorFlow.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- EvoAug-TF: Extending evolution-inspired data augmentations for genomic deep learning to TensorFlow.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSupervised deep learning is used to model the complex relationship between genomic sequence and regulatory function. Understanding how these models make predictions can provide biological insight into regulatory functions. Given the complexity of the sequence to regulatory function mapping (the cis-regulatory code), it has been suggested that the genome contains insufficient sequence variation to train models with suitable complexity. Data augmentation is a widely used approach to increase the data variation available for model training, however current data augmentation methods for genomic sequence data are limited.
resultsInspired by the success of comparative genomics, we show that augmenting genomic sequences with evolutionarily related sequences from other species, which we term phylogenetic augmentation, improves the performance of deep learning models trained on regulatory genomic sequences to predict high-throughput functional assay measurements. Additionally, we show that phylogenetic augmentation can rescue model performance when the training set is down-sampled and permits deep learning on a real-world small dataset, demonstrating that this approach improves data efficiency. Overall, this data augmentation method represents a solution for improving model performance that is applicable to many supervised deep-learning problems in genomics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The open-source GitHub repository agduncan94/phylogenetic_augmentation_paper includes the code for rerunning the analyses here and recreating the figures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.