Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38588512›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Full-dose whole-body PET synthesis from low-dose PET using high-efficiency denoising diffusion probabilistic model: PET consistency model.

Shaoyan Pan, Elham Abouei, Junbo Peng, Joshua Qian, Jacob F Wynne, Tonghe Wang, Chih-Wei Chang, Justin Roper, Jonathon A Nye, Hui Mao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. PET Image Reconstruction Using Deep Diffusion Image Prior.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical validation of a deep learning model for low-count PET image enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shaoyan PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Elham AboueiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Junbo PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joshua QianDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jacob F WynneDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tonghe WangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Chih-Wei ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Justin RoperDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jonathon A NyeRadiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Hui MaoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Science, and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
eXtended Modular ANthropomorphic (XMAN) phantom for Imaging and Treatment Optimization in Radiotherapy.R01EB032680 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI REN, LEI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Real-time Volumetric Imaging for Motion Management and Dose Delivery VerificationR01CA272991 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Multiparametric MRI-guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy with Focal Tumor BoostR01CA215718 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Artificial Intelligence Driven Platform for PET/MR ImagingR56EB033332 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, HUI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2022
$764k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215718NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272991NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032680NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB033332NIH HHS P30CA008748NIH HHS R01CA272991NIH HHS R01EB032680NIH HHS R56EB033332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePositron Emission Tomography (PET) has been a commonly used imaging modality in broad clinical applications. One of the most important tradeoffs in PET imaging is between image quality and radiation dose: high image quality comes with high radiation exposure. Improving image quality is desirable for all clinical applications while minimizing radiation exposure is needed to reduce risk to patients.

methodsWe introduce PET Consistency Model (PET-CM), an efficient diffusion-based method for generating high-quality full-dose PET images from low-dose PET images. It employs a two-step process, adding Gaussian noise to full-dose PET images in the forward diffusion, and then denoising them using a PET Shifted-window Vision Transformer (PET-VIT) network in the reverse diffusion. The PET-VIT network learns a consistency function that enables direct denoising of Gaussian noise into clean full-dose PET images. PET-CM achieves state-of-the-art image quality while requiring significantly less computation time than other methods. Evaluation with normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), multi-scale structure similarity index (SSIM), normalized cross-correlation (NCC), and clinical evaluation including Human Ranking Score (HRS) and Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) Error analysis shows its superiority in synthesizing full-dose PET images from low-dose inputs.

resultsIn experiments comparing eighth-dose to full-dose images, PET-CM demonstrated impressive performance with NMAE of 1.278 ± 0.122%, PSNR of 33.783 ± 0.824 dB, SSIM of 0.964 ± 0.009, NCC of 0.968 ± 0.011, HRS of 4.543, and SUV Error of 0.255 ± 0.318%, with an average generation time of 62 s per patient. This is a significant improvement compared to the state-of-the-art diffusion-based model with PET-CM reaching this result 12× faster. Similarly, in the quarter-dose to full-dose image experiments, PET-CM delivered competitive outcomes, achieving an NMAE of 0.973 ± 0.066%, PSNR of 36.172 ± 0.801 dB, SSIM of 0.984 ± 0.004, NCC of 0.990 ± 0.005, HRS of 4.428, and SUV Error of 0.151 ± 0.192% using the same generation process, which underlining its high quantitative and clinical precision in both denoising scenario.

conclusionsWe propose PET-CM, the first efficient diffusion-model-based method, for estimating full-dose PET images from low-dose images. PET-CM provides comparable quality to the state-of-the-art diffusion model with higher efficiency. By utilizing this approach, it becomes possible to maintain high-quality PET images suitable for clinical use while mitigating the risks associated with radiation. The code is availble at https://github.com/shaoyanpan/Full-dose-Whole-body-PET-Synthesis-from-Low-dose-PET-Using-Consistency-Model.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, StatisticalPositron-Emission TomographyRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioDiffusionHumansWhole Body Imagingconsistency modeldenoising diffusion probabilistic modelimage synthesisPET synthesisSwin transformer

Identifiers

PMID38588512
PMCPMC11321936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.