Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38588415›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

A survey of chromosomal instability measures across mechanistic models.

Andrew R Lynch, Shermineh Bradford, Amber S Zhou, Kim Oxendine, Les Henderson, Vanessa L Horner, Beth A Weaver, Mark E Burkard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Pretreatment Chromosomal Instability Correlates With Radiation Sensitivity in Squamous Cell Cancers.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  4. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew R LynchCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-682X
Shermineh BradfordCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.ORCID 0009-0007-1665-805X
Amber S ZhouCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.
Kim OxendineCytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Les HendersonCytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0009-0006-6291-4782
Vanessa L HornerCytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Services Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Beth A WeaverCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.ORCID 0000-0002-7830-3816
Mark E BurkardCarbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.ORCID 0000-0002-4215-7722
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
Training in Cancer Biology Training GrantT32CA009135 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SUGDEN, WILLIAM M. · 1985 to 2024
$10.4M
Training Program In Molecular AND Cellular PharmacologyT32GM008688 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AUDHYA, ANJON · 1998 to 2020
$6.0M
Impact of chromosomal instability on sensitivity to microtubule-targeting drugs in breast cancerR01CA234904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E, WEAVER, BETH A · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Mechanisms of Plk1 at the mitotic centromereR01GM141068 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WEAVER, BETH A · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
Multi-color Benchtop Flow CytometerS10RR025483 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BUSHMAN, WADE A · 2009 to 2009
$449k
Frequency and consequences of chromosome missegregation in breast cancerF31CA254247 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LYNCH, ANDREW · 2021 to 2022
$67k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA254247NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234904NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009135NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025483NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141068NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is the persistent reshuffling of cancer karyotypes via chromosome mis-segregation during cell division. In cancer, CIN exists at varying levels that have differential effects on tumor progression. However, mis-segregation rates remain challenging to assess in human cancer despite an array of available measures. We evaluated measures of CIN by comparing quantitative methods using specific, inducible phenotypic CIN models of chromosome bridges, pseudobipolar spindles, multipolar spindles, and polar chromosomes. For each, we measured CIN fixed and timelapse fluorescence microscopy, chromosome spreads, six-centromere FISH, bulk transcriptomics, and single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNAseq). As expected, microscopy of tumor cells in live and fixed samples significantly correlated (R = 0.72;

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityNeoplasmsAneuploidyCell Line, TumorCentromereChromosome SegregationGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaryotypinganeuploidychromosomal instabilityclinical biomarkersmitosis

Identifiers

PMID38588415
PMCPMC11032477
OpenAlexW4394565446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.