Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587945›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025

Clinical Evaluation of the ECG Noise Extraction Tool as a Component of ECG Analysis Algorithms Evaluation.

Ahmad Suliman, Masoud Farahmand, Loriano Galeotti, Christopher G Scully

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad Suliman
Masoud Farahmand
Loriano Galeotti
Christopher G Scully

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this work is to demonstrate the performance of the ECG noise extraction tool (ECGNExT) which provides estimates of ECG noise that are not significantly different from the inherent noise in an ECG generated by motion artifacts and other sources. In addition, this paper elaborates on use of ECGNExT in an algorithm evaluation context comparing two QRS detection algorithms.

methods140 simultaneous pairs of clean ECGs and ECGs corrupted with motion-induced noise from 29 participants under five different and separate motion conditions were collected and analyzed. Estimates of the noise component of the ECGs recorded with noise were obtained using ECGNExT and were then added to the clean ECGs yielding estimated ECGs with noise. Root mean squared error (RMSE) between the recorded and estimated ECGs with noise was calculated for temporal comparison, and band powers of the signals were calculated for spectral comparison.

resultsA t-test revealed that the mean RMSE < 150-microvolts with p-value < 0.001 and ${\bm{\alpha \ }} = {\bm{\ }}0.01$, and equivalence tests showed that the band powers of the two ECGs were statistically equivalent with ${\bm{\alpha \ }} = {\bm{\ }}0.01$.

conclusionECGNExT can reliably estimate the underlying ECG noise while preserving temporal and spectral features. SIGNIFICANCE: We previously proposed ECGNExT as a component of ECG analysis algorithm testing during noise conditions and reported its performance based on simulated ECG data. This work provides additional support of the performance and functionality of the ECGNExT algorithm from a study with pairs of simultaneously recorded ECGs with and without noise from human subjects.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsElectrocardiographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultFemaleHumansMaleSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID38587945
PMCPMC11458829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.