Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587844›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines Among Pregnant and Recently Pregnant Individuals.

Joshua T B Williams, Kate Kurlandsky, Kristin Breslin, M Joshua Durfee, Amy Stein, Laura Hurley, Jo Ann Shoup, Liza M Reifler, Matthew F Daley, Bruno J Lewin and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua T B WilliamsAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
Kate KurlandskyAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
Kristin BreslinAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
M Joshua DurfeeAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
Amy SteinAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
Laura HurleyAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
Jo Ann ShoupInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Liza M ReiflerInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora.
Matthew F DaleyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Bruno J LewinKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Kristin GoddardKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, California.
Michelle L HenningerCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
Jennifer C NelsonHealth Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle.
Gabriela Vazquez-BenitezHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kayla E HansonMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Candace C FullerDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric S WeintraubImmunization Safety Office, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael M McNeilImmunization Safety Office, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Simon J HambidgeAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado.
University of Colorado Denver · USKaiser Permanente · USDenver Health Medical Center · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USHarvard Pilgrim Health Care · USHealthPartners · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USKaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USMarshfield Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Pregnant people and infants are at high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Understanding changes in attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant and recently pregnant people is important for public health messaging. Objective: To assess attitudinal trends regarding COVID-19 vaccines by (1) vaccination status and (2) race, ethnicity, and language among samples of pregnant and recently pregnant Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) members from 2021 to 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional surveye study included pregnant or recently pregnant members of the VSD, a collaboration of 13 health care systems and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Unvaccinated, non-Hispanic Black, and Spanish-speaking members were oversampled. Wave 1 took place from October 2021 to February 2022, and wave 2 took place from November 2022 to February 2023. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to September 2023. Exposures: Self-reported or electronic health record (EHR)-derived race, ethnicity, and preferred language. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported vaccination status and attitudes toward monovalent (wave 1) or bivalent Omicron booster (wave 2) COVID-19 vaccines. Sample- and response-weighted analyses assessed attitudes by vaccination status and 3 race, ethnicity, and language groupings of interest. Results: There were 1227 respondents; all identified as female, the mean (SD) age was 31.7 (5.6) years, 356 (29.0%) identified as Black race, 555 (45.2%) identified as Hispanic ethnicity, and 445 (36.3%) preferred the Spanish language. Response rates were 43.5% for wave 1 (652 of 1500 individuals sampled) and 39.5% for wave 2 (575 of 1456 individuals sampled). Respondents were more likely than nonrespondents to be White, non-Hispanic, and vaccinated per EHR. Overall, 76.8% (95% CI, 71.5%-82.2%) reported 1 or more COVID-19 vaccinations; Spanish-speaking Hispanic respondents had the highest weighted proportion of respondents with 1 or more vaccination. Weighted estimates of somewhat or strongly agreeing that COVID-19 vaccines are safe decreased from wave 1 to 2 for respondents who reported 1 or more vaccinations (76% vs 50%; χ21 = 7.8; P < .001), non-Hispanic White respondents (72% vs 43%; χ21 = 5.4; P = .02), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic respondents (76% vs 53%; χ21 = 22.8; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: Decreasing confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety in a large, diverse pregnant and recently pregnant insured population is a public health concern.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansInfantPregnancySelf ReportUnited StatesVaccinationWhiteCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38587844
PMCPMC11002697
OpenAlexW4394579817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.