Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587819›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2024

d-Mannose for Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Among Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gail Hayward, Sam Mort, Alastair D Hay, Michael Moore, Nicholas P B Thomas, Johanna Cook, Jared Robinson, Nicola Williams, Nicola Maeder, Rebecca Edeson and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic strategies for multi-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CAUTIon - not all UTIs are the same.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Sugar Functionalized Collagen Material for Local Modulation of Innate Immunity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gail HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Sam MortNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Alastair D HayCentre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.
Michael MoorePrimary Care Research Centre, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom.
Nicholas P B ThomasWindrush Medical Practice, Witney, England, United Kingdom.
Johanna CookNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Jared RobinsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Nicola WilliamsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Nicola MaederNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Rebecca EdesonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Marloes FranssenOxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, England, United Kingdom.
Jenna GrabeyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Margaret GlogowskaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Yaling YangNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Julie AllenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBClinical Research Network Thames Valley and South MidlandsNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common debilitating condition in women, with limited prophylactic options. d-Mannose has shown promise in trials based in secondary care, but effectiveness in placebo-controlled studies and community settings has not been established. Objective: To determine whether d-mannose taken for 6 months reduces the proportion of women with recurrent UTI experiencing a medically attended UTI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-group, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial took place across 99 primary care centers in the UK. Participants were recruited between March 28, 2019, and January 31, 2020, with 6 months of follow-up. Participants were female, 18 years or older, living in the community, and had evidence in their primary care record of consultations for at least 2 UTIs in the preceding 6 months or 3 UTIs in 12 months. Invitation to participate was made by their primary care center. A total of 7591 participants were approached, 830 responded, and 232 were ineligible or did not proceed to randomization. Statistical analysis was reported in December 2022. Intervention: Two grams daily of d-mannose powder or matched volume of placebo powder. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women experiencing at least 1 further episode of clinically suspected UTI for which they contacted ambulatory care within 6 months of study entry. Secondary outcomes included symptom duration, antibiotic use, time to next medically attended UTI, number of suspected UTIs, and UTI-related hospital admissions. Results: Of 598 women eligible (mean [range] age, 58 [18-93] years), 303 were randomized to d-mannose (50.7%) and 295 to placebo (49.3%). Primary outcome data were available for 583 participants (97.5%). The proportion contacting ambulatory care with a clinically suspected UTI was 150 of 294 (51.0%) in the d-mannose group and 161 of 289 (55.7%) in the placebo group (risk difference, -5%; 95% CI, -13% to 3%; P = .26). Estimates were similar in per protocol analyses, imputation analyses, and preplanned subgroups. There were no statistically significant differences in any secondary outcome measures. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, daily d-mannose did not reduce the proportion of women with recurrent UTI in primary care who experienced a subsequent clinically suspected UTI. d-Mannose should not be recommended for prophylaxis in this patient group. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN13283516.

Indexed as

MannoseRecurrenceUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMannose

Identifiers

PMID38587819
PMCPMC11002776
OpenAlexW4394567606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.