Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587775›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024

The PRAMOS Study: PRostaglandin Analogues Monotherapy-Awareness Survey on Ocular Surface Involvement.

Paul Bastelica, Jean Paul Renard, Florent Aptel, Antoine Labbé, Cédric Schweitzer, Muriel Poli, Antoine Rousseau, Cédric Lamirel, Christophe Baudouin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul BastelicaQuinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, IHU FOReSIGHT, 75012, Paris, France. pbastelica@15-20.fr.
Jean Paul RenardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, 94160, Saint-Mandé, France.
Florent AptelCabinet d'ophtalmologie-Visis, 66000, Perpignan, France.
Antoine LabbéQuinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, IHU FOReSIGHT, 75012, Paris, France.
Cédric SchweitzerDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHU Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, INSERM, U1219-Bordeaux Population Health Research Centre, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Muriel PoliCentre Ophtalmologique Pôle Vision, Clinique du Val d'Ouest, 69130, Ecully, France.
Antoine RousseauDepartment of Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, IHU FOReSIGHT, 28 rue de Charenton, 75012, Paris, France.
Cédric LamirelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, 75019, Paris, France.
Christophe BaudouinQuinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, IHU FOReSIGHT, 75012, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEven though the local tolerance of prostaglandin (PG) analogues has improved drastically since the introduction of preservative-free (PF) eye drops, prescription patterns still vary widely among practitioners and between countries and could have an impact on the ocular surface of treated patients and, in consequence, their adherence. The aim of this study is to explore the prescribing patterns of PG analogues monotherapy in France and to evaluate their impact on ocular surface status.

methodsThis was a national multicenter cross-sectional observational study that was conducted by 18 glaucoma experts in France. Patients over 18 years of age and receiving monotherapy with topical PG analogues for the treatment of ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma, with no history of prior glaucoma surgery, were consecutively selected from the glaucoma outpatient clinics of participating physicians and underwent an ocular surface examination.

resultsA total of 344 eyes of 344 patients were enrolled between November 2022 and November 2023. Prescribed PG monotherapy was PF in 271 (78.7%) patients. Clinical history and ocular surface evaluation indicated that 79.4% of the study population (n = 273) presented with at least one symptom or clinical sign of dry eye and that three patients out of four had an unstable tear film. Subgroup analysis comparing preserved and PF PG analogues showed a higher prevalence of conjunctival hyperemia and corneal staining in the preserved group. Multivariate analysis identified conjunctival hyperemia as consistently associated with preservative use (odds ratio = 7.654; p = 0.003 for moderate conjunctival hyperemia).

conclusionsThis study highlights the growing trend toward PF PG analogue prescriptions by specialists in France. However, ocular surface issues remain prevalent, impacting patient adherence and treatment efficacy. Comprehensive ocular surface examinations are crucial in glaucoma management to enhance long-term tolerance, compliance, and overall treatment success.

Indexed as

Drug toxicityGlaucomaOcular surfacePrescription habitsProstaglandin analogues

Identifiers

PMID38587775
PMCPMC11109058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.