Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587739›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Measurements of Ascorbate and Dehydroascorbate in Plants Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Tamami Hamada, Takanori Maruta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tamami HamadaGraduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Shimane University, Matsue, Shimane, Japan.
Takanori MarutaGraduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Shimane University, Matsue, Shimane, Japan. maruta@life.shimane-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current concepts emphasize the fundamental role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as signaling molecules that coordinate defense mechanisms, cell death, and the growth and development processes in plants. However, due to the inherent reactivity of ROS, achieving precise control over their levels within plant cells, both spatially and temporally, becomes important to effectively harness the potential of ROS signaling while concurrently minimizing the risk of oxidative damage. Ascorbate is an exceptional antioxidant and contributes to the antioxidant defense system in plants. Its role is further reinforced by the presence of ascorbate peroxidases and enzymes responsible for recycling ascorbate from its oxidized forms. Ascorbate metabolism plays a pivotal role in averting oxidative damage and facilitates meticulous regulation of ROS signal availability. This chapter outlines the preferred protocol for the measurement of ascorbate.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsAscorbic AcidAscorbate PeroxidasesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntioxidantsAscorbate PeroxidasesAscorbic AcidReactive Oxygen SpeciesAbiotic stressAscorbateAscorbate–glutathione cycleAscorbate peroxidaseDehydroascorbate

Identifiers

PMID38587739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.