Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587687›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2024

The Need for Standardized Nomenclature in Electronic Documentation of Female Genital Cutting in Health Records.

Jae Creger, Kalthum Abdikeir, Kyra Kaczmarczik, Nicole Chaisson, Crista E Johnson-Agbakwu, Beatrice Bean E Robinson, Jennifer Jo Connor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jae CregerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kalthum AbdikeirSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kyra KaczmarczikUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicole ChaissonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Crista E Johnson-AgbakwuDivision Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School and UMass Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA.
Beatrice Bean E RobinsonEli Coleman Institute for Sexual and Gender Health, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 180, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Jennifer Jo ConnorEli Coleman Institute for Sexual and Gender Health, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 180, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. conno043@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-1442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of Electronic Health Record (EHR) documentation practices of Female Genital Cutting (FGC) by medical providers. A retrospective chart review study of 99 patient encounter notes within the University of Minnesota health system (inclusive of 40 hospitals and clinics) was conducted. Extracted data included but was not limited to patient demographics, reason for patient visit, ICD code used in note, and provider description of FGC anatomy. Data was entered into REDCAP and categorized according to descriptive statistics. Out of 99 encounters, 45% used the unspecified code for FGC. The most common reason for patient visits was sexual pain, though many notes contained several reasons for the visit regarding reproductive, urological, or sexual concerns. 56% of visits discussed deinfibulation. 11 different terms for FGC were used, with "female circumcision" being the most common. 14 different terms for deinfibulation were found within 64 notes. 42% of encounters included a description of introitus size in the anatomical description, and only 38% of these provided a metric measurement. This study found significant variation in the quality of FGC documentation practices. Medical providers often used the unspecified FGC code, subjective and/or seemingly inaccurate descriptions of FGC/anatomy, and several different terms for both FGC and deinfibulation. Clearly, more education is needed in clinical training programs to (1) identify FGC type, (2) use the corresponding ICD code, and (3) use specific, objective descriptions (including presence/absence of structures and infibulation status).

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleElectronic Health RecordsAdolescentAdultDocumentationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMinnesotaRetrospective StudiesTerminology as TopicYoung AdultFemale genital cuttingICD codingMedical documentationSexual pain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.