ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024
Correlation of retrobulbar perfusion deficits with glaucomatous visual field defects.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular Color Doppler Ultrasound (OCDUS) in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Ophthalmological, Cerebrovascular and Systemic Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- APSified Peripapillary Vessel Density in Glaucoma Suspects and Open-Angle Glaucoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study is to evaluate the correlation between retrobulbar perfusion deficits and glaucomatous visual field defects.
methodsEighty-four patients with glaucoma and 17 normal subjects serving as controls were selected. Color Doppler imaging (CDI) was used to measure the changes in blood flow parameters in the retrobulbar ophthalmic artery (OA), central retinal artery (CRA), and short posterior ciliary arteries (SPCAs). Visual field testing was performed using a Humphrey perimeter, categorizing the visual field deficits into four stages according to the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) scoring method. Subsequently, the correlation of retrobulbar hemodynamic parameter alterations among glaucomatous patients with varying visual field defects was examined.
resultsThe higher the visual field stage, the lower the peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the OA, CRA, and SPCAs in glaucomatous patients. The CRA had the highest sensitivity to changes in its PSV. The PSV of the temporal SPCA (TSPCA-PSV) was lower in advanced glaucoma than in early-stage glaucoma. The PSVs of the OA, CRA, and TSPCA, as well as the resistance index of the CRA (CRA-RI), were positively correlated with the visual field index and the mean deviation. Except for that of OA, the PSV of the retrobulbar vessels was negatively correlated with the pattern standard deviation (PSD). The OA-PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of the CRA and TSPCA were lower in patients with superior visual field defects than in those with inferior visual field defects.
conclusionsGreater severity of visual field defects corresponded to poorer retrobulbar blood flow in glaucomatous patients. Patients suffered significant perfusion impairments in the CRA at the early stage, accompanied by SPCA perfusion disorder at the advanced stage. The presence of a bow-shaped defect in the superior or inferior region of the visual field in moderate-stage glaucoma was closely correlated with retrobulbar vascular EDV.
trial registrationChiCTR2200059048 (2022-04-23).
Indexed as
Identifiers
38587654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.