Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587626›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Telemetric ICP monitoring in children: a national questionnaire-based study.

Sarah Hornshøj Pedersen, Kasper Amund Henriksen, Sara Duus Gustafsen, Torben Skovbo Hansen, Rikke Guldager, Marianne Juhler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah Hornshøj PedersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. sarah.skovlunde.hornshoej.pedersen.01@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3436-6081
Kasper Amund HenriksenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0237-9643
Sara Duus GustafsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Torben Skovbo HansenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rikke GuldagerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marianne JuhlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-7495

Funding

the Research Fund of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital E-22218-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTelemetric monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) facilitates long-term measurements and home monitoring, thus potentially reducing diagnostic imaging and acute hospital admissions in favour of outpatient appointments. Especially in paediatric patients, telemetric ICP monitoring requires a high level of collaboration and compliance from patients and parents. In this study, we aim to systematically investigate (1) patient and parent perception of telemetric ICP system utility and (2) hospital contact history and thus the potential cost-benefit of telemetric ICP monitoring in paediatric patients with a cerebrospinal fluid disorder.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide questionnaire study, including paediatric patients with either a current or previous telemetric ICP sensor and their parents. Additionally, a retrospective review of electronic health records for all included children was performed.

resultsWe included 16 children (age range 3-16 years), with a total of 41 telemetric ICP sensors implanted. Following sensor implantation, the frequency of telephone contacts and outpatient visits increased. No corresponding decrease in hospital admissions or total length of stay was found. The telemetric ICP sensor provided most parents with an improved sense of security and was seen as a necessary and valuable tool in treatment guidance. The size and shape of the sensor itself were reported as disadvantages, while the external monitoring equipment was reported as easy to use but too large and heavy for a child to carry.

conclusionThough, in quantitative terms, there was no cost-benefit of the telemetric ICP sensor, it contributed to extended parental involvement and a sense of improved safety.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureTelemetryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicParentsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesIntracranial pressureParental perceptionPatient perceptionQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID38587626
PMCPMC11269325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.