ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2024
Ablation-induced left atrial mechanical dysfunction recovers in weeks after ablation.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Left atrial functional changes associated with repeated catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe immediate impact of catheter ablation on left atrial mechanical function and the timeline for its recovery in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain uncertain. The mechanical function response to catheter ablation in patients with different AF types is poorly understood.
methodsA total of 113 AF patients were included in this retrospective study. Each patient had three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in sinus rhythm: one pre-ablation, one immediate post-ablation (within 2 days after ablation), and one post-ablation follow-up MRI (≤ 3 months). We used feature tracking in the MRI cine images to determine peak longitudinal atrial strain (PLAS). We evaluated the change in strain from pre-ablation, immediately after ablation to post-ablation follow-up in a short-term study (< 50 days) and a 3-month study (3 months after ablation).
resultsThe PLAS exhibited a notable reduction immediately after ablation, compared to both pre-ablation levels and those observed in follow-up studies conducted at short-term (11.1 ± 9.0 days) and 3-month (69.6 ± 39.6 days) intervals. However, there was no difference between follow-up and pre-ablation PLAS. The PLAS returned to 95% pre-ablation level within 10 days. Paroxysmal AF patients had significantly higher pre-ablation PLAS than persistent AF patients in pre-ablation MRIs. Both type AF patients had significantly lower immediate post-ablation PLAS compared with pre-ablation and post-ablation PLAS.
conclusionThe present study suggested a significant drop in PLAS immediately after ablation. Left atrial mechanical function recovered within 10 days after ablation. The drop in PLAS did not show a substantial difference between paroxysmal and persistent AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38587576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.