Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587062›Full record

Trial reportActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024

Hormone receptor mRNA and protein levels as predictors of premenopausal tamoxifen benefit.

Terese Engström, Maria Ekholm, Mårten Fernö, Christine Lundgren, Bo Nordenskjöld, Olle Stål, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Julia Tutzauer, Lisa Rydén

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Terese EngströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Maria EkholmDepartment of Oncology, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Mårten FernöDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Christine LundgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Bo NordenskjöldcDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Olle StålcDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Pär-Ola BendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Julia Tutzauer *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. julia.tutzauer@ki.se.
Lisa Rydén *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery and Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTamoxifen remains an important adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Thus, determination of hormone receptors is important. Here, we compare cytosol-based methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and gene expression (GEX) analysis for determining hormone receptor status in premenopausal breast cancer patients from a randomised tamoxifen trial, to evaluate their performance in identifying patients that benefit from tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND

methodsPremenopausal patients (n=564) were randomised to 2 years of tamoxifen or no systemic treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status by protein expression measured by cytosol-based methods and IHC, and mRNA by GEX analysis were compared in 313 patients with available data from all methods. Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox regression were used to evaluate the treatment-predictive value for recurrence-free interval (RFi) and overall survival (OS). Median follow-up for event-free patients was 26 (RFi) and 33 (OS) years.

resultsThe mRNA data of ESR1 and PGR distributed bimodally, patterns confirmed in an independent cohort. Kappa-values between all methods were 0.76 and 0.79 for ER and PR, respectively. Tamoxifen improved RFi in patients with ER-positive (ER+) or PR-positive (PR+) tumours (Hazard Ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]), cytosol-ER+ 0.53 [0.36-0.79]; IHC-ER+ 0.55 [0.38-0.79]; GEX-ER+ 0.54 [0.37-0.77]; cytosol-PR+ 0.49 [0.34-0.72]; IHC-PR+ 0.58 [0.40-0.85]; GEX-PR+ 0.55 [0.38-0.80]). Results were similar for OS.

interpretationThese methods can all identify patients that benefit from 2 years of tamoxifen with equal performance, indicating that GEX data might be used to guide adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHormonesHumansReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalHormonesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID38587062
PMCPMC11332536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.