Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587015›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2024

Upper Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Motility Pathology on Manometry in Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction.

Andrew Yousef, Amanda Krause, Rena Yadlapati, Priya Sharma, Philip A Weissbrod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Etiology, Clinical Presentation, and Management of Retrograde Cricopharyngeus Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Pooled it
  2. Breaking the Belch Barrier: Improving our Understanding of Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction (R-CPD).Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew YousefDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3126-1655
Amanda KrauseDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Rena YadlapatiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Priya SharmaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Philip A WeissbrodDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

Training Grant in GastroenterologyT32DK007202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 1985 to 2022
$7.7M
The MVP Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanism Guided vs PPI Strategy for Laryngopharyngeal RefluxR01DK139089 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Rena Hiren Yadlapati · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
Otolaryngology Training in Immunology, Virology and Molecular BiologyR25DC020173 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joseph A Califano · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
Mechanism Guided Therapy for Laryngopharyngeal RefluxK23DK125266 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YADLAPATI, RENA HIREN · 2021 to 2025
$963k
NIDCD NIH HHS R25 DC020173NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK125266NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK139089NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere exists a paucity of data regarding the mechanism and manometric findings in retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD). In this study, we aimed to compare esophageal physiologic findings between patients with RCPD compared to an asymptomatic cohort. STUDY

designCase-control study.

settingTertiary Care Center.

methodsEsophageal high-resolution impedance manometry was completed preoperatively in patients diagnosed with RCPD. Manometric data were compared between the RCPD and asymptomatic cohorts. A 2:1 age-sex-matched asymptomatic cohort was used as the control group. Treatment response was assessed among the RCPD cohort.

resultsThirty-nine patients are included: 13 RCPD [mean age: 31.1 (SD: 12.6) years, female sex: 11 (85%)] and 26 asymptomatic [mean age: 32.1 (SD: 1.5) years, female sex: 22 (85%)]. The RCPD cohort, compared to the asymptomatic cohort, exhibited significantly greater upper esophageal sphincter (UES) length [4.5 (SD: 0.7) vs 3.7 (0.9) cm, P = .01] and higher UES basal pressures [91.9 (35.0) vs 49.7 (25.5) mm Hg, P = .002]. Patients with RCPD demonstrated higher rates of ineffective swallows [70.0% (31.6%) vs 15.4% (21.6%), P < .001] and incomplete bolus clearance [81% (22.0%) vs 21.8% (30.0%), P < .001]. All patients who underwent cricopharyngeal botulinum injections experienced initial improvement of symptoms with 3 patients requiring repeat intervention.

conclusionRCPD is associated with a longer UES, elevated UES basal pressures, and an increased incidence of ineffective esophageal motility. This study is the first to compare preoperative manometry results among patients with RCPD to those of an asymptomatic cohort, providing insights into the mechanism of RCPD.

Indexed as

Esophageal Motility DisordersEsophageal Sphincter, UpperManometryAdultCase-Control StudiesDeglutition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbelching disordersdiagnostic toolshigh‐resolution manometryupper esophageal sphincter

Identifiers

PMID38587015
PMCPMC11580733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.