Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586948›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2024

Factors Influencing Patient Disclosure of Parkinson's Disease Genetic Testing Results to Relatives.

Jeanine Schulze, Jasmine Kaur Dhaliwal, Mandy Miller, Emily Quinn, Leah Wetherill, Lola Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeanine SchulzeIndiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-3425
Jasmine Kaur DhaliwalKeck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-5908
Mandy MillerIndiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0750-0719
Emily QuinnKeck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-1165
Leah WetherillIndiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-9051
Lola CookIndiana University School of Medicine, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-4598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have received genetic test results are faced with the decision of whether, and how, to share that information with family. Studies in other specialties have shown high rates of disclosure motivated by a sense of responsibility. Rates of, and attitudes surrounding, disclosure have yet to be reported in this population.

objectivesTo explore the disclosure practices and motivations of patients with PD regarding genetic test results, allowing insight to guide genetic counseling and navigation of test result discussions.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was distributed to adults with PD and previous genetic test results. Survey questions assessed demographics, genetic testing results and delivery, sharing behaviors, perceptions of PD, and motivations and barriers to family disclosure.

resultsAmong respondents, 88.9% shared results with at least one family member, most often a child (73.5%) or sibling (65.4%). Seventy-four percent reported sharing results with someone outside of their family, most frequently a friend (88.4%). The most common motivation for disclosure was the perception that family members would want to know. Barriers to disclosure were lack of close relationships, understanding results, and perceived utility.

conclusionsDisclosure rates in this PD population were consistent with those in previously reported populations. Motivations were anchored in perceptions of utility and family desire for information, suggesting a need to adjust patient education to improve retention and to explore family dynamics and perceptions of results.

Indexed as

DisclosureFamilyGenetic TestingParkinson DiseaseAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and Questionnairesfamily communicationgenetic counselinggeneticsParkinson's diseaserisk

Identifiers

PMID38586948
PMCPMC11233843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.