Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586775›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Usefulness of Deep Tendon Reflexes in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Spine Diseases: A Narrative Review.

Tadatsugu Morimoto, Hirohito Hirata, Kazuyuki Watanabe, Kinshi Kato, Koji Otani, Masaaki Mawatari, Takuya Nikaido

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tadatsugu MorimotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Hirohito HirataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Kazuyuki WatanabeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, JPN.
Kinshi KatoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, JPN.
Koji OtaniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, JPN.
Masaaki MawatariDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Takuya NikaidoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep tendon reflex (DTR) is a more objective indicator than sensory and muscle assessments for lumbar spine disorders. Further, unlike sensory and muscle assessments that require patient cooperation, the DTR can be assessed even in patients with impaired consciousness or cognition. Therefore, DTR assessment with a hammer is an essential neurological test for lumbar spinal diseases. However, despite the usefulness of DTR assessment, few reports have described the significance of increased, diminished, or absent deep lower extremity reflexes in lumbar spine diseases. This review outlines the history of DTR of the lower limbs and describes the techniques, evaluation, and interpretation of DTR for the diagnosis of lumbar spine diseases. The patellar tendon reflex (PTR) was the first parameter of lower extremity DTR identified to have clinical usefulness, followed by the Achilles tendon reflex (ATR), pathological reflexes (Babinski reflex), and reflex enhancement (Jendrassik maneuver). They have now become an integral part of clinical examination. To determine whether an increase or decrease in DTR is pathological, it is necessary to determine left-right differences, differences between the upper and lower extremities, and the overall balance of the limb. There are several critical limitations and pitfalls in interpreting DTRs for lumbar spine diseases. Attention should be paid to examiner and patient factors that make the DTR assessment less objective. When there is a discrepancy between clinical and imaging findings and the level of the lumbosacral nerve root disorder is difficult to diagnose, the presence of a lumbosacral transitional vertebra, nerve root malformation, or furcal nerve should be considered. In addition, assessing the DTR after the gait loading test and standing extension loading test, which induce lumbosacral neuropathy, will help provide a rationale for the diagnosis.

Indexed as

achilles tendon reflexdeep tendon reflexdiagnosislumbar spine diseasenarrative reviewpatellar tendon reflex

Identifiers

PMID38586775
PMCPMC10999014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.