ArticleCureus2024
A Survey on the Knowledge and Awareness of Testicular Cancer and Testicular Self-Examination Among Men in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge and awareness of testicular cancer (TC) and testicular self-examination (TSE) and to identify the associated factors in men in Saudi Arabia. Methods An online questionnaire-based study was conducted in Saudi Arabia with a representative sample of 794 participants. The questionnaire comprised knowledge, awareness and attitude questions regarding TC and TSE in addition to signs/symptoms and risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the significant variables associated with knowledge of TC and TSE. Results Around 43% (n=340) of the participants had inadequate knowledge of TC, whereas 26% (n=205) had heard about TSE and only 65 (8.2%) performed TSE. The first model for knowledge found that participants with a low level of education [2.75 (1.18, 6.42)]; no past history of a testicular problem [2.20 (1.22, 3.95)] and those who had not heard about TSE [1.79 (1.24, 2.57)] were at higher odds for inadequate knowledge, whereas those whose mothers had received college-level education [0.39 (0.19, 0.79)] and those who received information from school/college [0.61 (0.37, 0.97)] were more likely to have adequate knowledge about TC. The second model for TSE found that a low level of education 5.24 (1.34, 20.52) was associated with not performing TSE. Receiving information from social media [0.08 (0.03, 0.17)], school/college [0.06 (0.02, 0.13)], family and friends [0.17 (0.05, 0.57)] and medical staff [0.08 (0.03, 0.17)] were associated with higher odds of performing TSE. Conclusion The majority of Saudi males have knowledge about TC. On the contrary, only a small percentage of the respondents have heard of or performed TSE as a screening technique. Educated sources of information can be a reliable way of giving correct knowledge on sensitive topics like TSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.