Psychiatrists' Illustration of Awe in Empathic Listening Assessments: A Pilot Study.

Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan, Thomas M Brod, Thomas Lowder, Prasad R Padala

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parameshwaran RamakrishnanPsychiatry, Baptist Health-University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Thomas M BrodSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Thomas LowderGraduate Medical Education, Baptist Health-University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Prasad R PadalaPsychiatry, Baptist Health-University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background "Awe" is typically an inspiring emotional response to perceptually vast stimuli signifying the transcendence beyond all cognitive frames of reference when we encounter the unexpected. Physicians' experience of awe in clinical care interactions has not been studied in an empirical, evidence-based way. We aim to present a focused study of awe in a psychiatrist's empathic listening (EL) assessments and propose an evidence-based framework to study it. Methodology This is an exploratory case series of a psychiatrist's EL interactions (mean duration/

Indexed as

analytical autoethnographyawe and non-agencyclinical chaplaincycontemplative neuroscienceempathic listeningevidence-based medicine (ebm)metaphysics and phenomenologynon-dual and non-agencytranscendent unknowabletranspersonal mindfulness

Identifiers

PMID38586691

DOI10.7759/cureus.55684

PMCPMC10997879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.