Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586595›Full record

ArticlePain reports2024

Quantitative sensory testing for assessment of somatosensory function in children and adolescents: a scoping review.

Perri R Tutelman, Nicole E MacKenzie, Christine T Chambers, Siobhan Coffman, Laura Cornelissen, Brittany Cormier, Kristen S Higgins, Jackie Phinney, Markus Blankenburg, Suellen Walker

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Perri R TutelmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6013-7402
Nicole E MacKenzieDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Christine T ChambersDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Siobhan CoffmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Laura CornelissenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Brittany CormierCentre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health, Halifax, Canada.
Kristen S HigginsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Jackie PhinneyDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Dalhousie University, Saint John, Canada.
Markus BlankenburgPediatric Neurology, Psychosomatics and Pain Therapy, Children's Pain Center Baden-Württemberg, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany.
Suellen WalkerDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Great Ormond St Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) refers to a group of noninvasive psychophysical tests that examine responses to a range of calibrated mechanical and thermal stimuli. Quantitative sensory testing has been used extensively in adult pain research and has more recently been applied to pediatric pain research. The aims of this scoping review were to map the current state of the field, to identify gaps in the literature, and to inform directions for future research. Comprehensive searches were run in 5 databases. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened by 2 reviewers. Data related to the study aims were extracted and analyzed descriptively. A total of 16,894 unique studies were identified, of which 505 were screened for eligibility. After a full-text review, 301 studies were retained for analysis. Date of publication ranged from 1966 to 2023. However, the majority of studies (61%) were published within the last decade. Studies included participants across the developmental trajectory (ie, early childhood to adolescence) and most often included a combination of school-age children and adolescents (49%). Approximately 23% of studies were conducted in healthy samples. Most studies (71%) used only one QST modality. Only 14% of studies reported using a standardized QST protocol. Quantitative sensory testing in pediatric populations is an emerging and rapidly growing area of pain research. Future work is needed using comprehensive, standardized QST protocols to harness the full potential that this procedure can offer to our understanding of pediatric pain.

Indexed as

Pediatric painQuantitative sensory testingScoping reviewSomatosensory functioning

Identifiers

PMID38586595
PMCPMC10994437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.