Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586561›Full record

ArticleMethods in Psychology (Online)2024

Using longitudinal qualitative research to understand the experiences of minoritized people.

Christine V Wood, Ida Salusky, Remi F Jones, Robin Remich, Anne E Caliendo, Richard McGee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in Psychology (Online), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cultivating Authentic Partnership: Cooperative Development of a Toolkit to Mitigate Group Harm in Biorepository-Enabled Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine V WoodDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave, Room 18-134, Chicago, IL 60611.
Ida SaluskyDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave. 18 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611.
Remi F JonesDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave. 18 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611.
Robin RemichDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave. 18 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611.
Anne E CaliendoDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave. 18 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611.
Richard McGeeDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave. 18 Floor, Chicago, IL 60611.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Understanding Career Choices, Transitions and Success of Young Biomedical ScientistsR35GM118184 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2016 to 2025
$6.5M
Career Decision-Making of Future Minority Biomedical Science FacultyR01GM085385 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2008 to 2015
$3.0M
Pivotal Career Decisions Guiding Potential Women Science FacultyR01NR011987 · NINR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085385NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118184NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper demonstrates how Longitudinal Qualitative Research (LQR) is an innovative method to understand the lived experiences of members of minoritized groups when temporality is a structuring element of their experiences. Most qualitative research in psychology is cross-sectional, which limits our understanding of individuals whose experiences are context-dependent and linked to the temporal norms of specific social environments. LQR is unique for allowing researchers to compare change and stability over time and reveal how social challenges and barriers impact perspective shifts and long-term decision-making. To demonstrate the usefulness of LQR as an inclusive methodology, we discuss an ongoing study of career decision-making among a diverse cohort of biomedical scientists. We have used annual interviews to follow biomedical science trainees from the beginning of their PhD into the initial stages of their careers. We present case studies of minoritized scientists to illustrate the methods for long-term engagement used to elicit sensitive and critical information during their training. We show how LQR is a viable methodology for a variety of research questions and can be accomplished using large or small sample sizes and limited resources. Our primary goal is to show how LQR is useful to understand the experiences of minoritized individuals in contexts that have historically excluded them.

Indexed as

diversityethicsinterview techniquesPhD trainingQualitative methodsscience education

Identifiers

PMID38586561
PMCPMC10993913
OpenAlexW4389611835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.