ArticleClinical epidemiology2024
Validation of Diagnostic Codes to Identify Glaucoma in Taiwan's Claims Data: A Multi-Institutional Study.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- GWAS for primary angle-closure glaucoma identifies loci related to ocular biometry and morphology.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Association between probiotic prescriptions and the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with documented dry eye.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Timolol-Based Fixed-Combination Regimens for Glaucoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using Target Trial Emulation Framework.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Trends in First-Line Glaucoma Treatment from 2013 to 2024: A Multi-institutional and Multinational Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Positive Predictive Values of ICD-10-CM Diagnostic Codes in Identifying Diabetic Macular Edema in Claims Data: A Multi-Institutional Study in Taiwan.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and risk of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 1-3 chronic kidney disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD): in the Era of Artificial Intelligence, Causal Inference, and Data Security.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Review
- Epidemiology and Burden of Illness of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in Taiwan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Assessing the Validity of Claims-Based Diagnostic Codes for Psychotic and Affective Disorders and the Influence of the Coding Transition from the ICD-9 to the ICD-10 in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- Validating ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Claims Database.Clinical epidemiology · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and follow-up adherence of ophthalmic emergencies: A 10-year study at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare databases play a crucial role in improving our understanding of glaucoma epidemiology, which is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. However, the accuracy of diagnostic codes used in these databases to detect glaucoma is still uncertain. Aim: To assess the accuracy of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes in identifying patients with glaucoma, including two distinct subtypes, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). Methods: We analyzed electronic medical records data from a 2% random sample of patients who newly underwent visual field examination in Taiwan's largest multi-institutional healthcare system from 2011 to 2020. The diagnosis of glaucoma was confirmed by two ophthalmologists, based on the glaucoma diagnostic criteria. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity for ICD-9-CM codes 365.1X and 365.2X, and ICD-10-CM codes H4010X, H4011X, H4012X, H4020X, H4021X, H4022X, H4023X and H4024X for glaucoma were calculated. Results: We randomly selected 821 patients (mean age: 56.9 years old; female: 50.5%) from the original cohort of 41,050 newly receiving visual field examination in the study. Among 464 cases with an ICD-9-CM glaucoma code, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for glaucoma were 86.5, 96.5, 91.9, and 90.9%, respectively. Among 357 cases with an ICD-10-CM glaucoma code, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for glaucoma were 87.0, 92.8, 92.2 and 87.9%, respectively. The accuracy of diagnostic codes to identify POAG and PACG remained consistent. Conclusion: The diagnostic codes were highly reliable for identifying cases of glaucoma in Taiwan's routine healthcare practice. These results provide confidence when using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes to define glaucoma cases in healthcare database research in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.