Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586411›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Maximizing oil recovery: Innovative chemical EOR solutions for residual oil mobilization in Kazakhstan's waterflooded sandstone oilfield.

Mariam Shakeel, Dilyara Sagandykova, Aibek Mukhtarov, Amina Dauyltayeva, Laila Maratbekkyzy, Peyman Pourafshary, Darya Musharova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariam ShakeelSchool of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Dilyara SagandykovaSchool of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Aibek MukhtarovSchool of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Amina DauyltayevaSchool of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Laila MaratbekkyzySchool of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Peyman PourafsharySchool of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Darya MusharovaKazMunayGas Engineering, Astana, 010017, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of an experimental study to design a chemical flood scheme for a massive Kazakhstani oilfield with high water cut are presented in this paper. A meticulously formulated chemical flooding procedure entails injecting a blend comprising interfacial tension (IFT) reducing agents, alkaline/nanoparticles to control chemical adsorption, and polymer to facilitate mobility control. Overall, this well-conceived approach leads to a significant enhancement in the mobilization and production of residual oil. Experiments were conducted in Kazakhstan's Field A, one of the country's oldest oilfields with over 90% water cut and substantial remaining oil, to assess the efficiency of various hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) derived polymers and surfactant solutions. Additionally, the effectiveness of alkaline and nanoparticles in minimizing chemical adsorption for the screened surfactant and polymer was investigated. These assessments were conducted under reservoir conditions, with a temperature of 63 °C, and using 13,000 ppm Caspian seawater as makeup brine. The performance assessment of the selected chemicals was carried out through a set of oil displacement tests on reservoir cores. Critical parameters, including chemical adsorption, interfacial tension, resistance factor, and oil recovery factor, were compared to determine the most effective chemical flooding approach for Field A. Both the surfactant-polymer (SP) and alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) approaches were more successful in recovering residual oil by efficiently generating and delivering microemulsion, producing more than 90% of the remaining oil after waterflooding. Due to the low increase in recovery compared to SP and the complexity of applying ASP at the field scale, SP was recommended for the pilot test studies. This investigation underscores that the choice of chemicals is contingent upon the interplay between the specific characteristics of the oil, the geological formation, the injection water, and the reservoir rock. Consequently, assessing all potential configurations on reservoir cores is imperative to identify the most optimal chemical combination. The practical challenges at the field scale should also be considered for the final decision. The results of this study contribute to the successful design and implementation of tailored chemical flooding to challenging oilfields with excessive water cut and high residual oil.

Identifiers

PMID38586411
PMCPMC10998114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.