Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586273›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Cost analysis of different medical oxygen sources for a healthcare facility in India.

Varun Manhas, Mahipal Rawat, Yogesh S Kaurav, Sanjay Goyal, Sanjay Dhir, Kalyani Sangineni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pricing Policy for Medical Oxygen and Potential Savings.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Varun ManhasOne Health Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-9994
Mahipal RawatIndependent Consultant, Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5585-9480
Yogesh S KauravDirectorate Health Services, Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-1258
Sanjay GoyalRevenue Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-9673
Sanjay DhirDepartment of Management Studies (DMS), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-9602
Kalyani SangineniDepartment of Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bibinagar, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-5118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Multiple sources of medical oxygen, namely liquid medical oxygen (LMO) tanks, pressure swing adsorption (PSA) plants, concentrators, and gaseous cylinders, are available at different healthcare facilities. These sources of oxygen have varying installation and operational costs. In low-resource settings, it is imperative to utilise these assets optimally. This study investigated the operational costs of multiple oxygen sources available at a healthcare facility. Methods: A Microsoft (MS) Excel-based model was developed to analyse and compare the oxygen manufacturing costs (in ₹/m Results: The oxygen manufacturing costs for PSA plants of different capacities and running times on electricity and diesel generators (DGs) as a power source were calculated. This study highlights the cost-benefit of using PSA plants over LMO and third-party vendor-refilled cylinders as a source of oxygen. PSA plants are most economical when they are of higher capacity and used to their maximum capacity on electricity as the power source. On the contrary, they are most expensive when used on a DG set as a power source. Furthermore, this study provides evidence of PSA plants being more cost-effective for refilling cylinders using a booster compressor unit when compared to third-party vendor-cylinder refilling. Conclusion: Given their cost-effectiveness and low third-party dependence, they should be utilised to their maximum capacity as medical oxygen sources at healthcare facilities.

Indexed as

Booster compressor unitscost analysisgaseous cylindershospitalsliquid medical oxygenmedical oxygenpressure swing adsorption plants

Identifiers

PMID38586273
PMCPMC10993950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.