Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586258›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Evaluation of two doses (20 mL and 15 mL) of 0.25% bupivacaine in pericapsular nerve group block for patient positioning for sub-arachnoid block during hip fracture surgery: A single-centre, randomised comparative trial.

Anita Sharma, Shelly Rana, Bhanu Gupta, Aditi Ranaut, Rita Khanoria, Neha Bhardwaj

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07130006 (Preoperative Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07130006 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures: a Factorial Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of SplitRan2025 to 2026Enrolled256ConditionsFractures, Hip, Femoral Neck Fractures, Intertrochanteric Fractures, Subtrochanteric FracturesArmsPENG and LFCN peripheral nerve blocks with spinal anesthesia, FN and LFCN peripheral nerve blocks with spinal anesthesia, FIC peripheral nerve block with spinal anesthesia, Fentanyl (IV) with spinal anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anita SharmaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-1833
Shelly RanaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9464-1252
Bhanu GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5614-1660
Aditi RanautDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9747-6894
Rita KhanoriaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-8968
Neha BhardwajDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Dr. R.P. Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1501-762X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel ultrasound (US)-guided technique to achieve regional analgesia in hip fractures. We compared the effectiveness of two doses of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL and 15 mL) in the US-guided PENG block for positioning patients for sub-arachnoid block (SAB) during hip fracture surgery. Methods: The randomised trial included 60 patients aged 40-90 years undergoing hip fracture surgery under SAB. PENG block was given by a US-guided approach with the patient in a supine position 20 minutes before SAB, and a total of 20 mL and 15 mL of bupivacaine (0.25%) were given in groups A and B, respectively. The primary outcome was to measure and compare the ease of positioning (EOP) of patients for the conduct of SAB. The secondary outcome was the pain assessment at rest and 15° leg raise position at baseline and 10 and 20 minutes post block using the verbal analogue scale (VAS). Continuous variables were compared using the Results: The mean (standard deviation) grade of EOP for SAB was significantly better in group A (2.47 (0.73) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.19-2.69)) than in group B (1.86 (0.62) (95% CI: 1.65-2.1)) ( Conclusion: A dose of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine shows better outcomes than 15 mL regarding the patient's positioning during the SAB.

Indexed as

Anaestheticsanalgesiabupivacaineease of positioninghip fracturesnerve blockpainpericapsular nerve group blockpositioningsub-arachnoid block

Identifiers

PMID38586258
PMCPMC10993932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.