ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024
Evaluation of a Seizure Action Plan in an Adult Epilepsy Center.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the seizure cycle: Belgian expert consensus on the diagnostics and treatment of acute convulsive seizures in children.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- Study protocol for a prospective, cluster randomised control, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate the Reduction Of Seizures through Education and Support: the ROSES study.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Immediate Treatment of Seizure Clusters: A Conceptual Roadmap to Expedited Seizure Management.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024Review
- Hope for the Best but Plan for the Worst: Seizure Action Plans in Adult Epilepsy Clinics.Epilepsy currentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Seizure action plans (SAPs) provide valuable information for patients to manage seizure emergencies, but are underutilized in adult epilepsy centers. The purpose of this project was to implement a structured SAP for adult patients with epilepsy. Methods: A pre/postimplementation design was used. Provider SAP utilization rates were analyzed over a 16-week period. A pre and postimplementation survey assessed participant perceived impact of the SAP on knowledge and comfort associated with managing seizure emergencies. Provider barriers and facilitators were also assessed. Results: Average provider SAP utilization rate was 51.45%. A total of 204 participants completed the surveys, which showed a significant increase in knowledge and comfort for all items, Discussion: Implementing a structured SAP increased provider utilization and patient and care partner knowledge and comfort of managing seizure emergencies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.