Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586192›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Large-scale real-world data on a multidisciplinary approach to spinal cord stimulation for persistent spinal pain syndromes: first evaluation of the Neuro-Pain

Lisa Bernaerts, Ella Roelant, Frederic Lecomte, Maarten Moens, Jean-Pierre Van Buyten, Bart Billet, Bart Bryon, Martine Puylaert, Tuna Turgay, Maureen Malone and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lisa BernaertsMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ella RoelantClinical Trial Center (CTC), CRC Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Frederic LecomteNational Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium.
Maarten MoensDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Pierre Van BuytenMultidisciplinary Pain Center, AZ Niklaas, Sint Niklaas, Belgium.
Bart BilletMultidisciplinary Pain Center, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Bart BryonMultidisciplinary Pain Center, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium.
Martine PuylaertMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Tuna TurgayMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
Maureen MaloneMultidisciplinary Pain Center, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Tom TheysDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan Van ZundertMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Anne BerquinDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires UCL, St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Erwin CrombezMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier De CosterMultidisciplinary Pain Center, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Johan VangeneugdenDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Sint Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium.
Huynh Giao LyNational Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium.
Marleen LouagieNational Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium.
Guy Henri HansMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation is a common treatment option for neuropathic pain conditions. Despite its extensive use and multiple technological evolutions, long term efficacy of spinal cord stimulation is debated. Most studies on spinal cord stimulation include a rather limited number of patients and/or follow-ups over a limited period. Therefore, there is an urgent need for real-world, long-term data. Methods: In 2018, the Belgian government initiated a nationwide secure platform for the follow-up of all new and existing spinal cord stimulation therapies. This is a unique approach used worldwide. Four years after the start of centralized recording, the first global extraction of data was performed. Results: Herein, we present the findings, detailing the different steps in the centralized procedure, as well as the observed patient and treatment characteristics. Furthermore, we identified dropouts during the screening process, the reasons behind discontinuation, and the evolution of key indicators during the trial period. In addition, we obtained the first insights into the evolution of the clinical impact of permanent implants on the overall functioning and quality of life of patients in the long-term. Discussion: Although these findings are the results of the first data extraction, some interesting conclusions can be drawn. The long-term outcomes of neuromodulation are complex and subject to many variables. Future data extraction will allow us to identify these confounding factors and the early predictors of success. In addition, we will propose further optimization of the current process.

Indexed as

chronic painlong-term datanation-wide dynamic registerneuropathic painneurostimulatorspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38586192
PMCPMC10996860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.