ArticleData in brief2024
Increasing accessibility to a large brain-computer interface dataset: Curation of physionet EEG motor movement/imagery dataset for decoding and classification.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental fatigue in football: methodology and experimental protocol.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- A multi-paradigm EEG dataset for studying upper limb rehabilitation exercises.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Threats and Mitigation Strategies for Electroencephalography-Based Person Authentication.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the Application of Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation Medicine Over the Past 20 Years.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Motor imagery EEG classification via wavelet-packet synthetic augmentation and entropy-based channel selection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A reliable motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) requires accurate decoding, which in turn requires model calibration using electroencephalography (EEG) signals from subjects executing or imagining the execution of movements. Although the PhysioNet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset is currently the largest EEG dataset in the literature, relatively few studies have used it to decode MI trials. In the present study, we curated and cleaned this dataset to store it in an accessible format that is convenient for quick exploitation, decoding, and classification using recent integrated development environments. We dropped six subjects owing to anomalies in EEG recordings and pre-possessed the rest, resulting in 103 subjects spanning four MI and four motor execution tasks. The annotations were coded to correspond to different tasks using numerical values. The resulting dataset is stored in both MATLAB structure and CSV files to ensure ease of access and organization. We believe that improving the accessibility of this dataset will help EEG-based MI-BCI decoding and classification, enabling more reliable real-life applications. The convenience and ease of access of this dataset may therefore lead to improvements in cross-subject classification and transfer learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.