ArticleData in brief2024
Simulated dataset on coordinated reset stimulation of homogeneous and inhomogeneous networks of excitatory leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with spike-timing-dependent plasticity.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present simulated data on coordinated reset stimulation (CRS) of plastic neuronal networks. The neuronal network consists of excitatory leaky integrate-and-fire neurons and plasticity is implemented as spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). A synchronized state with strong synaptic connectivity and a desynchronized state with weak synaptic connectivity coexist. CRS may drive the network from the synchronized state into a desynchronized state inducing long-lasting desynchronization effects that persist after cessation of stimulation. This is used to model brain stimulation-induced transitions between a pathological state, with abnormally strong neuronal synchrony, and a physiological state, e.g., in Parkinson's disease. During CRS, a sequence of stimuli is delivered to multiple stimulation sites - called CR sequence. We present simulated data for the analysis of long-lasting desynchronization effects of CRS with shuffled CR sequences versus non-shuffled CR sequences in which the order of stimulus deliveries to the sites remains unchanged throughout the entire stimulation period. Such data are presented for networks with homogeneous synaptic connectivity and networks with inhomogeneous synaptic connectivity. Homogeneous synaptic connectivity refers to a network in which the probability of a synaptic connection does not depend on the pre- and postsynaptic neurons' locations. In contrast, inhomogeneous synaptic connectivity refers to a network in which the probability of a synaptic connection depends on the neurons' locations. The presented neuronal network model was used to analyse the impact of the CR sequences and their shuffling on the long-lasting effects of CRS [1].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.