ReviewBioinformatics advances2024
Quantitative transcriptomic and epigenomic data analysis: a primer.
Review in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChromTag: an interactive R-shiny platform for analysis and visualization of CUT&Tag and ChIP-seq peak profiling data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Population-level allelic dispersion modeling by maelstRom yields genome-wide maps of allele-specific dysregulation during early carcinogenesis.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Sparassis latifolia and exercise training as complementary medicine mitigated the 5-fluorouracil potent side effects in mice with colorectal cancer: bioinformatics approaches, novel monitoring pathological metrics, screening signatures, and innovative management tactic.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of microarray and second generation sequencing technology has revolutionized the field of molecular biology, allowing researchers to quantitatively assess transcriptomic and epigenomic features in a comprehensive and cost-efficient manner. Moreover, technical advancements have pushed the resolution of these sequencing techniques to the single cell level. As a result, the bottleneck of molecular biology research has shifted from the bench to the subsequent omics data analysis. Even though most methodologies share the same general strategy, state-of-the-art literature typically focuses on data type specific approaches and already assumes expert knowledge. Here, however, we aim at providing conceptual insight in the principles of genome-wide quantitative transcriptomic and epigenomic (including open chromatin assay) data analysis by describing a generic workflow. By starting from a general framework and its assumptions, the need for alternative or additional data-analytical solutions when working with specific data types becomes clear, and are hence introduced. Thus, we aim to enable readers with basic omics expertise to deepen their conceptual and statistical understanding of general strategies and pitfalls in omics data analysis and to facilitate subsequent progression to more specialized literature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.