ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Effect of memory therapy on enhancing postoperative cognitive function recovery and alleviating mood disturbances in brain glioma patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Regional and systemic complications following glioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Application of multidimensional cognitive training in the early postoperative period for glioma patients with cognitive impairment.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the impact of memory therapy on enhancing recovery of postoperative cognitive function and alleviating mood disturbances in brain glioma patients.
methodsThis retrospective study included 160 brain glioma patients who met the inclusion criteria from August 2019 to July 2022. They were divided into a control group and an observation group according to according to different treatment method, with 80 cases in each group. The control group was given routine rehabilitation, while the observation group received additional memory therapy. The study compared complications between the two groups, focusing on the changes in cognitive function [using the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Check Scale (NCSE), Clinical Dementia Score (CDR)], mood disturbances [measured by the State Anxiety Scale (S-AI), Trait Anxiety Scale (T-AI), and Hospital Stress Scale score], health-promoting behaviors [evaluated with the Chinese Version of Health Promotion Lifestyle Scale-II (HPLP-II)], coping styles [assessed through the Medical Response Questionnaire (MCQM)], and cancer-related fatigue [using the Cancer-Related Fatigue Scale (CFS)] before and after intervention were observed. A total of 160 glioma cases were classified into either a good or poor prognosis category, based on their prognosis 12 months post-surgery. Baseline data from both groups were compared, and multivariate logistic regression was employed to analyze the factors influencing outcomes in glioma patients.
resultsAfter intervention, the observation group exhibited higher scores of NCSE, HPLP-II, and CFS, but lower scores on the CDR, S-AI, T-AI and hospital stress scale compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Additionally, within the MCQM, the observation group showed reduced avoidance and yield scores, and an increased facing score, compared to the control group (all P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the complication rates of the control (8.75%) and observation groups (3.75%) (P>0.05). However, the incidence of adverse prognosis was significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (8.75% vs 22.50%) (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in age, maximum tumor diameter, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score, gender or lesion location between the poor prognosis group and the good prognosis group (all P>0.05). The poor prognosis group had a higher proportion of patients in clinical stages III-IV and a lower proportion receiving recall therapy compared to good prognosis group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified clinical stage (III-IV stage) [OR=3.562 (95% CI: 1.476-8.600)] as a risk factor for poor prognosis after brain glioma surgery (P<0.05), while undergoing memory therapy [β=0.330 (95% CI: 0.99-0.842)] acted as a protective factor against poor prognosis (P<0.05).
conclusionMemory therapy has been shown to promote postoperative cognitive function recovery in glioma patients, reduce anxiety and stress response, bolster coping mechanisms and health-promoting behavior, diminish cancer-related fatigue, and improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.