Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586101›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: an efficacy analysis.

Yusen Dai, Daoyou Li, Xile Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yusen DaiDepartment of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Pingyang Pingyang County, Wenzhou 325400, Zhejiang, China.
Daoyou LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Pingyang Pingyang County, Wenzhou 325400, Zhejiang, China.
Xile WenDepartment of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Pingyang Pingyang County, Wenzhou 325400, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis retrospective study evaluated the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

methodsData of 107 LDH patients admitted to the People's Hospital of Pingyang between July 2019 and May 2023 were analyzed retrospectively, including 51 cases treated with conventional open discectomy (control group) and 56 cases undergoing PTED (research group). We compared curative effects, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), incision length, time until ambulation, hospital stay, pre- and post-treatment pain intensity, lumbar function, and complications. Pain intensity was measured using the the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the lumbar function was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). In addition, the factors influencing the efficacy in LDH patients were analyzed.

resultsThe research group showed a statistically higher overall efficacy (P=0.034, χ

conclusionsPTED is more effective than conventional open discectomy for LDH treatment. It reduces IBL, shortens incision length, facilitates patient recovery, alleviates postoperative pain, improves lumbar function, and minimizes the risk of postoperative complications.

Indexed as

clinical efficacyLumbar disc herniationpercutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomysafety

Identifiers

PMID38586101
PMCPMC10994797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.