ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Prediction of vascular complications in free flap reconstruction with machine learning.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Prediction and Assessment of Compromised Free Flaps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- A soft biosensor with printable responsive hydrogel interfaces for detection and differentiation of blood circulation complications.National science review · 2026Article
- Review
- Development and validation of a Nomogram to predict postoperative flap necrosis risk in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore the risk factors of vascular complications following free flap reconstruction and to develop a clinical auxiliary assessment tool for predicting vascular complications in patients undergoing free flap reconstruction leveraging machine learning methods.
methodsWe reviewed the medical data of patients who underwent free flap reconstruction at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University retrospectively from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. Statistical analysis was used to screen risk factors. A training data set was generated and augmented using the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Logistic regression, random forest and neural network, models were trained, using this dataset. The performance of these three predictive models was then evaluated and compared using a test set, with four metrics, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsA total of 570 patients who underwent free flap reconstruction were included in this study, 46 of whom developed postoperative vascular complications. Among the models tested, the neural network model exhibited superior performance on the test set, achieving an AUC of 0.828. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that preoperative hemoglobin levels, preoperative fibrinogen levels, operation duration, smoking history, the number of anastomoses, and peripheral vascular injury as statistically significant independent risk factors for vascular complications post-free flap reconstruction. The top five predictive factors in the neural network were fibrinogen content, operation duration, donor site, body mass index (BMI), and platelet count.
conclusionHemoglobin levels, fibrinogen levels, operation duration, smoking history, and anastomotic veins are independent risk factors for vascular complications following free flap reconstruction. These risk factors enhance the ability of machine learning models to predict the occurrence of vascular complications and identify high-risk patients. The neural network model outperformed the logistic regression and random forest models, suggesting its potential to aid clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients thereby mitigating patient suffering and improving prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.