Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586081›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024

Stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer - Acute toxicity and patient-reported outcomes in the prospective, multicenter

C A Fink, J Ristau, C Buchele, S Klüter, J Liermann, P Hoegen-Saßmannshausen, E Sandrini, A Lentz-Hommertgen, L Baumann, N Andratschke and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: a systematic literature review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

C A FinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
J RistauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
C BucheleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
S KlüterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
J LiermannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
P Hoegen-SaßmannshausenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
E SandriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
A Lentz-HommertgenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
L BaumannInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
N AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
M BaumgartlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
M LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
M ReinerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
S CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
D BonekampDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
H-P SchlemmerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
C BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
M GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
S A KoerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to superior image quality and daily adaptive planning, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) has the potential to further widen the therapeutic window in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. This study reports on acute toxicity rates and patient-reported outcomes after MR-guided adaptive ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer within the prospective, multicenter phase II Materials and methods: A total of 69 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent MRgSBRT with daily online plan adaptation. Inclusion criteria comprised a tumor stage ≤ T3a, serum PSA value ≤ 20 ng/ml, ISUP Grade group ≤ 4. A dose of 37.5 Gy was prescribed to the PTV in five fractions on alternating days with an optional simultaneous boost of 40 Gy to the dominant intraprostatic lesion defined by multiparametric MRI. Acute genitourinary (GU-) and gastrointestinal (GI-) toxicity, as defined by CTCAE v. 5.0 and RTOG as well as patient-reported outcomes according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and -PR25 scores were analyzed at completion of radiotherapy, 6 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy and compared to baseline symptoms. Results: There were no toxicity-related treatment discontinuations. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no grade 3 + toxicities were reported according to CTCAE. Up until the 12-week visit, in total 16 patients (23 %) experienced a grade 2 GU or GI toxicity. Toxicity rates peaked at the end of radiation therapy and subsided within the 12-week follow-up period. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no residual grade 2 GU toxicities were reported and 1 patient (1 %) had residual grade 2 enteritic symptoms. With exception to a significant improvement in the emotional functioning score following MRgSBRT, no clinically meaningful changes in the global health status nor in relevant subscores were reported. Conclusion: Daily online-adaptive MRgSBRT for localized prostate cancer resulted in an excellent overall toxicity profile without any major negative impact on quality of life.

Indexed as

Daily adaptive radiotherapyMR-guided radiotherapyProstate cancerStereotactic radiation therapyToxicity

Identifiers

PMID38586081
PMCPMC10998039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.