ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
FLIGHTED: Inferring Fitness Landscapes from Noisy High-Throughput Experimental Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) for protein design requires large protein fitness datasets generated by high-throughput experiments for training, fine-tuning, and benchmarking models. However, most models do not account for experimental noise inherent in these datasets, harming model performance and changing model rankings in benchmarking studies. Here we develop FLIGHTED, a Bayesian method of accounting for uncertainty by generating probabilistic fitness landscapes from noisy high-throughput experiments. We demonstrate how FLIGHTED can improve model performance on two categories of experiments: single-step selection assays, such as phage display and SELEX, and a novel high-throughput assay called DHARMA that ties activity to base editing. We then compare the performance of standard machine-learning models on fitness landscapes generated with and without FLIGHTED. Accounting for noise significantly improves model performance, especially of CNN architectures, and changes relative rankings on numerous common benchmarks. Based on our new benchmarking with FLIGHTED, data size, not model scale, currently appears to be limiting the performance of protein fitness models, and the choice of top model architecture matters more than the protein language model embedding. Collectively, our results indicate that FLIGHTED can be applied to any high-throughput assay and any machine learning model, making it straightforward for protein designers to account for experimental noise when modeling protein fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.