Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38586030›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Low-Cost Robotic Manipulation of Live Microtissues for Cancer Drug Testing.

Ivan Stepanov, Noah R Gottshall, Alireza Ahmadianyazdi, Daksh Sinha, Ethan J Lockhart, Tran N H Nguyen, Sarmad Hassan, Lisa F Horowitz, Raymond S Yeung, Taranjit S Gujral and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ivan Stepanov
Noah R Gottshall
Alireza Ahmadianyazdi
Daksh Sinha
Ethan J Lockhart
Tran N H Nguyen
Sarmad Hassan
Lisa F Horowitz
Raymond S Yeung
Taranjit S Gujral
Albert Folch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scarcity of human biopsies available for drug testing is a paramount challenge for developing new therapeutics, disease models, and personalized treatments. Microtechnologies that combine the microscale manipulation of tissues and fluids offer the exciting possibility of miniaturizing both disease models and drug testing workflows on scarce human biopsies. Unfortunately, these technologies presently require microfluidic devices or robotic dispensers that are not widely accessible. We have rapidly-prototyped an inexpensive platform based on an off-the-shelf robot that can microfluidically manipulate live microtissues into/out of culture plates without using complicated accessories such as microscopes or pneumatic controllers. The robot integrates complex functions with a simple, cost-effective and compact construction, allowing placement inside a tissue culture hood for sterile workflows. We demonstrated a proof-of-concept cancer drug evaluation workflow of potential clinical utility using patient tumor biopsies with multiple drugs on 384-well plates. Our user-friendly, low-cost platform promises to make drug testing of microtissues broadly accessible to pharmaceutical, clinical, and biological laboratories. Teaser: A low-cost robot for handling microtissues and catalyzing their use in cancer drug evaluation and personalized oncology.

Identifiers

PMID38586030
PMCPMC10996467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.