ArticleResearch square2024
Admission viscoelastic hemostatic assay parameters predict poor long-term intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHA) provide more comprehensive assessments of coagulation compared to conventional coagulation assays. While VHAs have enabled guided hemorrhage control therapies, improving clinical outcomes in life-threatening hemorrhage, the role of VHAs in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. If VHAs can identify coagulation abnormalities relevant for ICH outcomes, this would support the need to investigate the role of VHAs in ICH treatment paradigms. Thus, we investigated whether VHA assessments of coagulation relate to long-term ICH outcomes. Methods: Spontaneous ICH patients enrolled into a single-center cohort study receiving admission Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) VHA testing between 2013 and 2020 were assessed. Patients with prior anticoagulant use or coagulopathy on conventional coagulation assays were excluded. Primary ROTEM exposure variables were coagulation kinetics and clot strength assessments. Poor long-term outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale ≥ 4 at 6 months. Logistic regression analyses assessed associations of ROTEM parameters with clinical outcomes after adjusting for ICH severity and hemoglobin concentration. Results: Of 44 patients analyzed, mean age was 64, 57% were female, and the median ICH volume was 23 mL. Poor 6-month outcome was seen in 64%. In our multivariable regression models, slower, prolonged coagulation kinetics (adjusted OR for every second increase in clot formation time: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09, p = 0.04) and weaker clot strength (adjusted OR for every millimeter increase of maximum clot firmness: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99, p = 0.03) were separately associated with poor long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Slower, prolonged coagulation kinetics and weaker clot strength on admission VHA ROTEM testing, not attributable to anticoagulant use, were associated with poor long-term outcomes after ICH. Further work is needed to clarify the generalizability and the underlying mechanisms of these VHA findings to assess whether VHA guided treatments should be incorporated into ICH care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.