Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585830›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Altered empathy processing in frontotemporal dementia A task-based fMRI study.

Olof Lindberg, Tie-Qiang Li, Cecilia Lind, Susanna Vestberg, Ove Almkvist, Mikael Stiernstedt, Anita Ericson, Nenad Bogdanovic, Oskar Hansson, Luke Harper and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Olof LindbergDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6352-108X
Tie-Qiang LiDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Cecilia LindDepartment of community medicine and rehabilitation, geriatrics Umeå university, Umeå university, Sweden.
Susanna VestbergDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ove AlmkvistDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
Mikael StiernstedtUmeå center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Sweden.
Anita EricsonDepartment of community medicine and rehabilitation, geriatrics Umeå university, Umeå university, Sweden.
Nenad BogdanovicDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
Oskar HanssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Luke HarperClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Eric WestmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3115-2977
Caroline GraffDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-2951
Theofanis TsevisDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
Peter MannfolkDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Håkan FischerDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustav NilsonneDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Predrag PetrovicCenter for Psychiatric Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Lars NybergUmeå center for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Sweden.
Lars-Olof WahlundDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Neo, 14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
Alexander F SantilloClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Swedish FTD initiative
Karolinska Institutet · SELund University · SEUmeå University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SESkåne University Hospital · SEStockholm University · SE

Funding

Prospective validation and implementation of high-performing blood biomarkers and digital cognitive tests for detection of Alzheimer's disease in specialist memory clinic and primary care settingsR01AG083740 · NIA · LUNDS UNIVERSITET · PI Sebastian Palmqvist · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG083740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of empathy, and particularly its affective components, is a core symptom of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Visual exposure to images of a needle pricking a hand (pain condition) and Q-tips touching a hand (control condition) is an established functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm used to investigate empathy for pain (EFP; pain condition minus control condition). EFP has been associated with increased blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in regions known to become atrophic in the early stages in bvFTD, including the anterior insula and the anterior cingulate. We therefore hypothesized that patients with bvFTD would display altered empathy processing in the EFP paradigm. Here we examined empathy processing using the EFP paradigm in 28 patients with bvFTD and 28 sex and age matched controls. Participants underwent structural MRI, task-based and resting-state fMRI. The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) was used as a measure of different facets of empathic function outside the scanner. The EFP paradigm was analysed at a whole brain level and using two regions-of-interest approaches, one based on a metanalysis of affective perceptual empathy versus cognitive evaluative empathy and one based on the controĺs activation pattern. In controls, EFP was linked to an expected increase of BOLD signal that displayed an overlap with the pattern of atrophy in the bvFTD patients (insula and anterior cingulate). Additional regions with increased signal were the supramarginal gyrus and the occipital cortex. These latter regions were the only ones that displayed increased BOLD signal in bvFTD patients. BOLD signal increase under the affective perceptual empathy but not the cognitive evaluative empathy region of interest was significantly greater in controls than in bvFTD patients. The controĺs rating on their empathic concern subscale of the IRI was significantly correlated with the BOLD signal in the EFP paradigm, as were an informantś ratings of the patientś empathic concern subscale. This correlation was not observed on other subscales of the IRI or when using the patient's self-ratings. Finally, controls and patients showed different connectivity patterns in empathy related networks during resting-state fMRI, mainly in nodes overlapping the ventral attention network. Our results indicate that reduced neural activity in regions typically affected by pathology in bvFTD is associated with reduced empathy processing, and a predictor of patientś capacity to experience affective empathy.

Indexed as

Empathic concernEmpathyFrontotemporal dementiaFunctional MRI

Identifiers

PMID38585830
PMCPMC10996471
OpenAlexW4393186848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.