ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
The molecular detection of carbapenem markers with a two-levels amplification screening protocol: epidemiological and resistome insights.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic characterization of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Active Microbiological Surveillance for Contrasting Multi-Drug-Resistant Pathogens: Comparison Between a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method and Culture.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sequencing Analysis of Invasive Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Active Surveillance of Patients Colonized with CRE: A Single-Center Study Based on a Combined Molecular/Culture Protocol.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Combined Use of Phenotypic Screening and of a Novel Commercial Assay (REALQUALITY Carba-Screen) for the Rapid Molecular Detection of Carbapenemases: A Single-Center Experience.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Carbapenem-resistance is a challenging healthcare concern and require specific stewardship programs. Monitoring workflows include the identification from surveillance samples, such as rectal swabs. Although culture assays represent the gold standard, data report a significant effectiveness in detecting carbapenemases genes directly from rectal swabs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the REALQUALITY Carba-Screen kit (AB ANALITICA, Padova, Italy) in detecting carbapenemases genes directly from rectal swabs, also comparing its effectiveness to culture assays results. A next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to investigate the positive samples about resistance markers and sequence type (ST). Methods: A number of 136 rectal swabs were collected from the University Hospital Policlinico of Catania critical wards. The samples simultaneously underwent culture and molecular assays (REALQUALITY Carba-Screen kit). The molecular method included two-steps. The first step (1 h and 6 min) rapidly excluded negative samples, while the second one (1 h and 6 min) included only positive samples for a resistance confirmation. All the positive culture samples underwent NGS analysis. Results: Statistical evaluations demonstrated high sensitivity (100%) and detection rates (92.6%) for the REALQUALITY Carba-Screen kit, which mostly correlated to the standard workflow. All the culture positive results matched the positive molecular results, which were mainly confirmed by the NGS resistome analysis. The identified ST appeared to be diversified and different from the clinically significative strains of the same setting, furnishing interesting epidemiological evidence. Conclusion: The molecular detection allowed a coordinate approach in a high-prevalence multi-drug-resistance area. The rapid identification with a multi-step procedure accelerated the infection control procedures, while the preliminary negative results reduced the overtreatment episodes. The molecular method efficacy was confirmed through the NGS. In conclusion, the molecular screening could initially lead to a more conservative approach, which may be reevaluated after a culture result about the microorganisms' identification and susceptibility profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.