ArticleF1000Research2020
The Norwegian public's ability to assess treatment claims: results of a cross-sectional study of critical health literacy.
Article in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of information in news media reports about the effects of health interventions: Systematic review and meta-analyses.F1000Research · 2021Pooled it
- A Critical Health Literacy Podcast to Counter Health Misinformation at Scale: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.Global health, science and practice · 2024Trial
- Exploring school nurses' potential to strengthen young people's resilience to misinformation by promoting critical health literacy in Norway.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Article
- Informed decisions about public health and social measures.Health research policy and systems · 2025Review
- Promoting informed health choices: the long and winding road.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Measurement of critical health literacy in primary school pupils: a Polish validation of the Claim Evaluation Tools.BMJ open · 2025Article
- The People's Review protocol: planning an innovative study powered by the public.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- Critical thinking about health and treatments in the United States: a cross-sectional assessment of parents and undergraduate college students.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Evaluating health claim assessment skills of parents with preschool children: A cross-sectional study using Informed Health Choices Claim Evaluation Tool.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Serious Game Application to Engage University Students in Critical Thinking About Health Claims: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Evaluating student's ability to assess treatment claims: validating a German version of the Claim Evaluation Tools.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: to persuade or to inform?Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Using claims in the media to teach essential concepts for evidence-based healthcare.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.