Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585622›Full record

ArticleTest (Madrid, Spain)2024

Power priors for replication studies.

Samuel Pawel, Frederik Aust, Leonhard Held, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Test (Madrid, Spain), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Being Bayesian in the 2020s: opportunities and challenges in the practice of modern applied Bayesian statistics.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel PawelEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), Center for Reproducible Science (CRS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2779-320X
Frederik AustDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-788X
Leonhard HeldEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), Center for Reproducible Science (CRS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-5325
Eric-Jan WagenmakersDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-1034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing replication crisis in science has increased interest in the methodology of replication studies. We propose a novel Bayesian analysis approach using power priors: The likelihood of the original study's data is raised to the power of

Indexed as

Bayes factorBayesian hypothesis testingBayesian parameter estimationHierarchical modelsHistorical data

Identifiers

PMID38585622
PMCPMC10991061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.