ArticleJournal of medicine and life2023
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open reduction alone versus open reduction with pelvic osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children over 1.5 years of age.
Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prevalence of clinically significant proximal femoral growth disturbance following open versus closed reduction in dysplastic hips performed after 6 months: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 150 studies.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparison of treatment methods in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is commonly addressed through surgical intervention, usually performed in a specialized tertiary care facility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes in patients with DDH who had open reduction alone or in conjunction with bone surgery at our facility. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with DDH, categorizing them into two groups: Group OR underwent open reduction (OR) alone, and group ORBO underwent OR in conjunction with femoral or pelvic osteotomies. The modified McKay classification was used to evaluate clinical outcomes, and the Severin classification was used to evaluate radiological outcomes. Avascular necrosis and other postoperative issues were observed. Our cohort consisted of 66 patients (76 hips), with a mean age at surgery of 1.8±2.6 and a follow-up period ranging from one to three years. Clinically, 48 out of 66 patients achieved satisfactory outcomes, and radiologically, 47 patients were classified as satisfactory. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the radiological outcome (P=0.85), more patients in the OR group than in the ORBO group (P=0.05) had better outcomes. Avascular necrosis (AVN) was observed in 23 hips (34.8%), with Grade I AVN being the most prevalent in 19 hips that underwent OR with bone surgery (63.2%). The occurrence of AVN was associated with poorer clinical and radiological outcomes (P=0.05). Overall, the DDH operation at our center had positive outcomes. The OR group showed better clinical outcomes despite similar radiological findings and AVN rates compared to the OR with bone surgery group. The presence of AVN was linked to poor clinical and radiological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.