Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585515›Full record

ReviewACS organic & inorganic Au2024

Advanced Electroanalysis for Electrosynthesis.

Monica Brachi, Wassim El Housseini, Kevin Beaver, Rohit Jadhav, Ashwini Dantanarayana, Dylan G Boucher, Shelley D Minteer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS organic & inorganic Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica BrachiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.
Wassim El HousseiniDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.
Kevin BeaverDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.
Rohit JadhavDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-7253
Ashwini DantanarayanaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.
Dylan G BoucherDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.
Shelley D MinteerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrosynthesis is a popular, environmentally friendly substitute for conventional organic methods. It involves using charge transfer to stimulate chemical reactions through the application of a potential or current between two electrodes. In addition to electrode materials and the type of reactor employed, the strategies for controlling potential and current have an impact on the yields, product distribution, and reaction mechanism. In this Review, recent advances related to electroanalysis applied in electrosynthesis were discussed. The first part of this study acts as a guide that emphasizes the foundations of electrosynthesis. These essentials include instrumentation, electrode selection, cell design, and electrosynthesis methodologies. Then, advances in electroanalytical techniques applied in organic, enzymatic, and microbial electrosynthesis are illustrated with specific cases studied in recent literature. To conclude, a discussion of future possibilities that intend to advance the academic and industrial areas is presented.

Identifiers

PMID38585515
PMCPMC10995937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.