ArticleRadiology case reports2024
"Stent-within-a-Stent" technique for the endovascular treatment of giant aneurysm of basilar artery bifurcation: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stents have become very important devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Flow diverters as high metal coverage stents are developed for hemodynamic treatment of challenging intracranial aneurysms. High level of metal coverage can also be achieved by implementing regular stents telescopically one in another. We present the case of a patient successfully treated for giant aneurysm of basilar artery bifurcation by a "Stent-within-a-Stent" technique. After stent implantation, coil embolization was performed using multiple-sized platinum helical coils. Control angiography performed at the end of the procedure revealed aneurysm occlusion. After 3 years, the patient is fully neurologically recovered, without pyramidal deficit, independently active and able to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.