ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Next Generation Sequencing in orthopaedic infections - Where is the road headed?
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision medicine in orthopaedics: A review of current technologies and future directions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Musculoskeletal infection, diagnosis and management.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Management of periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a game changer in the field of orthopaedic diagnostics, notably in the detection and management of infections associated with prosthetic joints and implants. This paper conducts an exhaustive examination of the pivotal role, outcomes, and prospective future uses of NGS in diagnosing orthopaedic infections. In comparison to conventional culture-based methods, NGS offers a marked improvement in sensitivity thereby facilitating prompt and comprehensive identification of pathogens. This encompasses the ability to detect polymicrobial infections, antibiotic-resistant strains, and previously imperceptible microorganisms. Furthermore, this article delves into the technology's contribution to advancing personalized medicine and promoting judicious antibiotic use. Nonetheless, the seamless integration of NGS into routine clinical practice is impeded by challenges such as substantial financial outlays, the requisite for specialized equipment and expertise, and the intricacy associated with data analysis. Notwithstanding these impediments, the potential for NGS to revolutionize orthopaedic diagnostics remains substantial, with ongoing advancements poised to address current limitations and broaden its scope within clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.