Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38585347›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Combined cortical thickness and blink reflex recovery cycle to differentiate essential tremor with and without resting tremor.

Camilla Calomino, Andrea Quattrone, Maria Giovanna Bianco, Rita Nisticò, Jolanda Buonocore, Marianna Crasà, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Alessia Sarica, Aldo Quattrone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camilla Calomino *Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Andrea Quattrone *Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Giovanna BiancoNeuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Rita NisticòNeuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Jolanda BuonocoreDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Neurology, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Marianna CrasàNeuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Grazia VaccaroNeuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Alessia SaricaNeuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Aldo QuattroneNeuroscience Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the performance of structural MRI cortical and subcortical morphometric data combined with blink-reflex recovery cycle (BRrc) values using machine learning (ML) models in distinguishing between essential tremor (ET) with resting tremor (rET) and classic ET. Methods: We enrolled 47 ET, 43 rET patients and 45 healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent brain 3 T-MRI and BRrc examination at different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 100-300 msec). MRI data (cortical thickness, volumes, surface area, roughness, mean curvature and subcortical volumes) were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images. We employed two decision tree-based ML classification algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and Random Forest) combining MRI data and BRrc values to differentiate between rET and ET patients. Results: ML models based exclusively on MRI features reached acceptable performance (AUC: 0.85-0.86) in differentiating rET from ET patients and from HC. Similar performances were obtained by ML models based on BRrc data (AUC: 0.81-0.82 in rET vs. ET and AUC: 0.88-0.89 in rET vs. HC). ML models combining imaging data (cortical thickness, surface, roughness, and mean curvature) together with BRrc values showed the highest classification performance in distinguishing between rET and ET patients, reaching AUC of 0.94 ± 0.05. The improvement in classification performances when BRrc data were added to imaging features was confirmed by both ML algorithms. Conclusion: This study highlights the usefulness of adding a simple electrophysiological assessment such as BRrc to MRI cortical morphometric features for accurately distinguishing rET from ET patients, paving the way for a better classification of these ET syndromes.

Indexed as

blink reflexcortical thicknessessential tremoressential tremor plusmachine learningrest tremor

Identifiers

PMID38585347
PMCPMC10995929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.