ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024
The Evolution of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (PCO
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Author Response: The Evolution of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (PCOIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- The Evolution of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (pCOIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Venoarterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide Difference: Let's Trend It!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The usual methods of perfusion assessment in patients with shock, such as capillary refill time, skin mottling, and serial serum lactate measurements have many limitations. Veno-arterial difference in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO Materials and methods: This prospective observational study included 110 adults with circulatory shock. Patients were resuscitated as per current standards of care. We recorded invasive arterial pressure, urine output, cardiac index (CI), PCO Results: Significant decrease in PCO Conclusion: We found that a persistently high PCO How to cite this article: Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Kulkarni AP, Vaidya HS, Gurav SK, Deshmukh AM,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.